Web automation is a crucial component of software testing. Companies use web automation to check that their websites and web applications work as expected. Two of the most popular tools for web automation are Cypress and Playwright.
When comparing Cypress vs Playwright, it is essential to understand how these tool operates, the features they provide, and how they support various testing needs. This article will compare Cypress and Playwright in terms of scalability and browser support. The goal is to help you determine which tool is better suited to your needs.
What Is Cypress?
Cypress is an end-to-end testing framework for web applications. It is written in JavaScript and runs directly in the browser. Cypress is known for its simple syntax and easy-to-use interface. Many developers like Cypress because it is quick to set up and provides instant feedback as you write tests.
Cypress runs tests directly in the browser. It uses a special Electron-based app to control the browser. This means that Cypress can show you exactly what happens during each test. You can watch your tests run in real time and see where things go wrong. Cypress is a good choice for teams that want to test web pages quickly and see results right away.
Advantages of Cypress
- Clear Test Insight: Cypress takes screenshots while tests run. This helps testers see each step and understand what happened during the test. They can easily check the commands and their results.
- Easy Debugging: Cypress works well with tools like Developer Tools. It shows clear errors and helpful stack traces. This helps testers quickly identify and resolve issues that have occurred.
- Automatic Waiting: Cypress waits for commands and checks to finish on its own. This means there is no need to add wait times or pauses in the code, making tests cleaner and easier to write.
- Covers Multiple Testing Needs: Cypress checks how functions behave, how the server responds, and how timers work. It covers more than just one type of testing, which makes it useful for different needs.
- Control Over Network Traffic: Testers can modify or block network calls without requiring assistance from the server. Cypress makes it simple to create different testing conditions by adjusting the network traffic during tests.
Disadvantages of Cypress
- Limited Browser Support: Cypress only works with a few browsers like Chrome, Edge, Firefox, and Electron. It does not support Internet Explorer. For Safari, it supports WebKit, but that is still being tested. If your project needs to run tests across more browsers, you may need to use other tools.
- No Support for Mobile Apps: Cypress cannot test native mobile applications. You can change the screen size to match mobile views, but this is not the same as testing on real mobile devices or emulators.
- Cannot Test Across Multiple Domains: Cypress cannot move between different websites during a single test because of browser security rules. For example, if your test needs to go from your main site to a login page on another domain, Cypress will not support that.
- No Support for Multiple Browser Instances: Cypress cannot run more than one browser window at the same time. If your app needs to check how different users interact in real time, such as in a group chat or shared dashboard, Cypress cannot do this.
- Dependency Challenges: Cypress depends on other modules like Chai for writing test checks. When these modules are updated, your tests may stop working properly. Keeping all tools up to date without breaking your tests can be a challenge.
- Extra Setup Needed for CI/CD: Cypress can be added to your CI/CD process, but it might need some extra work to run smoothly. Cypress tests can use a lot of memory and CPU, especially when running many tests at once. This can slow down your build process. Also, Cypress runs in a headless mode by default in CI, which might not match how the tests behave in a regular browser.
- High Use of System Resources: Running Cypress on large projects or with complex test cases can use a lot of memory and processing power. This can slow down testing and may need better infrastructure to run smoothly.
What Is Playwright?
Playwright is an open-source browser automation library mainly used for end-to-end testing of web applications. It was created by Microsoft and supports multiple programming languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Java, and C#.
Playwright works by controlling browsers externally using automation protocols, including the Chrome DevTools Protocol. It supports multiple browsers like Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit. This lets you write one set of tests and run them across different browsers without changing your code.
Playwright is a strong choice for teams that want to test their websites and web apps on various browsers and devices to ensure consistent user experiences.
Advantages of Playwright
- Built-in Waits: One common problem with test automation is tests failing sometimes even when nothing has changed. This happens often in Selenium, where you must add wait commands to make sure elements appear or can be clicked. Even then, tests may still fail in pipelines or different setups.
Playwright reduces this issue by using automatic waits. It waits for elements to be ready before performing actions. This makes tests more stable and easier to write. In some cases, you may still need to adjust waits, but it happens less often.
- Support for Multiple Languages: Playwright supports many languages such as JavaScript, TypeScript, Java, Python, and C#. Cypress mainly supports JavaScript and TypeScript. If your team works with different languages, Playwright is a better fit.
- All-in-One Setup: With other tools, you may need to add separate tools for test running, assertions, reports, and screenshots. Playwright includes these tools already. This saves time during setup and makes it easier to get started. The tools also work well together since they are built as part of the same framework.
- Visual Studio Code Plugin: There is a Playwright extension for Visual Studio Code that helps when writing tests. It provides features like running tests directly from the editor and seeing errors easily. This plugin is updated often and helps testers work faster.
Disadvantages of Playwright
- Asynchronous Code Style: Playwright uses an asynchronous coding style. This means that test commands do not run one after the other by default. You have to tell the test when to wait before moving to the next step. While many tools are also moving in this direction, this way of writing tests can be confusing for those who are new to automation. It may take extra time to understand how the code flows. Some IDEs now provide better help with this kind of code, but beginners may still find it difficult.
- Learning Materials and Help Articles: The official Playwright documentation can be hard to understand, especially for people who are learning test automation or switching from manual testing. Also, many online answers on sites like Stack Overflow are based on old versions of Playwright. This makes it harder to find useful examples and correct solutions.
- More Features Than Needed: Playwright comes with many ways to do the same task. While this gives you flexibility, it can also confuse new users. Compared to other frameworks, Playwright may feel more complicated. This can lead teams to build test setups that are hard to understand or use. In some cases, teams end up with a very advanced setup when a simpler one would have worked better. It is better to keep things clear and easy for everyone who works on the tests.
Scalability
Scalability means how well a tool can handle many tests at once. As your test suite grows, you need a tool that can run tests quickly and handle large projects.
Cypress Scalability
Cypress can run tests in parallel, but there are some limits. By default, Cypress runs tests one after another. If you want to run tests at the same time, you need to use Cypress Cloud or a third-party tool. Cypress Cloud is a paid service that helps you split your tests across many machines. This makes your tests finish faster, but it may increase your costs.
Cypress can also use plugins like cypress-parallel to run tests in parallel on your own machines. However, this setup is not as simple as Playwright’s built-in parallelism. Cypress divides tests at the file level, so each test file runs on a different machine or process. If you have many small test files, this works well. But if you have a few large test files, it may not speed up your tests as much.
Cypress has a dashboard that shows test results from different machines. This helps you keep track of your tests, but you need to use Cypress Cloud for the best experience.
Playwright Scalability
Playwright has strong support for running tests in parallel. It can run many test files at the same time, using all the CPU cores on your machine. You can also split tests across different machines using a feature called test sharding. This means you can run thousands of tests quickly, even for very large projects.
Playwright’s parallelization is built into the tool. You do not need to pay for a cloud service or use extra plugins. You can set the number of workers in your configuration file, and Playwright will handle the rest. Each worker runs tests in isolation, so one test will not affect another.
Playwright also supports running tests in parallel within a single test file. This gives you more control over how your tests run. If you need to run tests on many machines, Playwright makes it easy to split the work and finish faster.
Browser Support
Browser support is very important for web automation. Users may visit your website using different browsers, so you need to make sure your site works everywhere.
Cypress Browser Support
Cypress mainly supports Chromium-based browsers. This includes Google Chrome, Microsoft Edge, and the built-in Electron browser. Cypress does not support Safari. Support for Firefox is limited and may not work for all features. Cypress does not support testing on real mobile devices or on the Safari browser.
If your users only use Chrome or Edge, Cypress may be enough. But if you need to test on Safari or Firefox, Cypress may not meet your needs.
Playwright Browser Support
Playwright supports all modern browsers. This includes Chromium (which covers Chrome and Edge), Firefox, and WebKit (which covers Safari). Playwright can also run tests on different operating systems, such as Windows, macOS, and Linux. This makes Playwright a better choice if you need to test your website on many browsers and platforms.
Playwright also has some support for testing on mobile devices. While it is not as complete as some other tools, it is more flexible than Cypress in this area.
To cover even more ground, teams can use cloud testing platforms like LambdaTest. LambdaTest is an AI-native test orchestration and execution platform that provides access to 3,000+ real browsers and operating system combinations. You can test across older and latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari (via WebKit), Edge, and more. You can run Playwright or Cypress scripts across these browsers in parallel, which helps reduce execution time and makes it easier to test at scale.
Conclusion
Cypress and Playwright are both strong tools for web automation. Cypress is simple and great for quick feedback in Chrome and Edge. Playwright supports more browsers and has better built-in features for running large numbers of tests at once. If you need to test on Safari or Firefox, or if you want to run tests in parallel without extra costs, Playwright is the better choice. If you want a simple tool for Chrome and Edge, and your tests are not very large, Cypress is a good option.
Both tools have active communities and good documentation. Consider your project requirements, browser compatibility, and team capabilities before making a decision. Both Cypress and Playwright can help you build better web applications by catching problems early and making testing easier.
Looking for something completely different? You can also check out our free Morse code translator tool perfect for quickly encoding or decoding messages in Morse code.