Site icon Cordless.io

The Popularity of Soccer in the USA. Is This the Rise of a New Superpower?

American soccer

American soccer is no longer insignificant. Critics often emphasize, though, that it is still in the puberty stage. Others, however, say it is on the right path to becoming a global superpower like France or Argentina. Here’s what the truth looks like based on facts.

How does MLS compare to other US sports?

Major League Soccer (MLS) has grown significantly in popularity since its founding in 1996 and is now firmly established as the top professional soccer league in the United States. However, when compared to other major sports leagues in the US, its popularity is still generally behind the “big four” American sports: NFL (football), NBA (basketball), MLB (baseball), and NHL (ice hockey).

Attendance and viewership

The MLS fan base

Media coverage and sponsorship

Cultural and grassroots growth

Comparison to other leagues

MLS is experiencing steady and impressive growth and is more popular than ever, particularly among young and diverse audiences. While it still trails behind the NFL, NBA, and MLB in national prominence and viewership, it is closing the gap in certain markets and has a very promising future, especially with the momentum building toward the 2026 World Cup. The league’s popularity is expected to continue rising in the coming years.

Can the US national soccer team be like Les Tricolores?

The growing popularity of soccer definitely improves the odds of America becoming a real-deal superpower like the French national team (Les Tricolores). But a true superpower status requires a confluence of structural, cultural, and competitive factors that go far beyond fan enthusiasm alone. Below is a layered analysis that looks at the key ingredients, where the United States currently stands, and what would still need to happen for the USMNT to join the ranks of perennial global contenders such as Brazil, Germany, Spain, France, or Argentina.

Elite‑level player development

Current reality: Only a handful of U.S. players regularly start for elite European clubs (e.g., Christian Pulisic at Chelsea, Gio Reyna at PSV, and Tyler Wright at Leeds United). The majority of top‑tier MLS players are still domestically developed but rarely break into the Champions League.

What’s needed: A systematic pathway that moves the best talents to Europe at ages 16–19, while ensuring they receive regular first‑team minutes. This may involve stronger partnerships with European clubs, loan structures, and a cultural shift that embraces early overseas moves.

Tactical and technical maturity

Current reality: U.S. teams often display athleticism and fitness but can lag in nuanced tactical discipline and ball control under pressure—areas traditionally honed in European academies.

What’s needed: Wider adoption of possession‑based, high‑pressing philosophies at youth levels, coupled with exposure to varied tactical systems (e.g., Mediterranean, South American). Coaching curricula must emphasize decision‑making and technical refinement from the earliest ages.

Consistency in major tournaments

Current reality: The USMNT has qualified for every World Cup since 1990, but knockout‑stage exits are common (Round of 16 in 2010 and 2014; group‑stage exit in 2018). The team has dominated CONCACAF but rarely faces the depth of competition found in UEFA or CONMEBOL.

What’s needed: Regular high‑stakes matches against top‑ranked nations outside of friendlies—e.g., participation in the UEFA Nations League format, more frequent friendlies against top‑10 teams, and perhaps integration into a “European‑style” qualification group.

The American national team can excel in these areas without being a “superpower.” The Netherlands, for example, historically produced great players but hasn’t won a World Cup. To be called a superpower, the USMNT would need sustained excellence across most of these dimensions.

Click Here to Read More!

Exit mobile version